Anthropic's Terms of Service prohibit use of our services in certain regions due to legal, regulatory, and security risks. However, companies from these restricted regions—including adversarial nations like China—continue accessing our services in various ways, such as through subsidiaries incorporated in other countries.

Companies subject to control from authoritarian regions like China face legal requirements that can compel them to share data, cooperate with intelligence services, or take other actions that create national security risks. These requirements make it difficult for companies to resist these pressures regardless of where they operate or of the personal preferences of the individuals at those companies. When these entities access our services through subsidiaries, they could use our capabilities to develop applications and services that ultimately serve adversarial military and intelligence services and broader authoritarian objectives. They could also potentially use our models to advance their own AI development through techniques like distillation and to compete globally with trusted technology companies headquartered in the United States and allied countries.

To account for this reality and better align with our commitment to ensuring that transformative AI capabilities advance democratic interests, we are strengthening our regional restrictions. This update prohibits companies or organizations whose ownership structures subject them to control from jurisdictions where our products are not permitted, like China, regardless of where they operate. This includes entities that are more than 50% owned, directly or indirectly, by companies headquartered in unsupported regions. This change ensures our Terms of Service reflect real-world risks and are true to the spirit of our policies.

Consistent with this concern, we continue to advocate for policies like strong export controls to prevent authoritarian nations from developing frontier AI capabilities that could threaten national security, accelerating energy projects on US soil to build out large-scale infrastructure for AI scaling, and rigorously evaluating AI models for national security relevant capabilities, including those that could be exploited by US adversaries.

The safety and security of AI development requires collective commitment to preventing its misuse by authoritarian adversaries. Responsible AI companies can and should take decisive action to ensure that transformative technologies serve US and allied strategic interests and support our democratic values.

来源:
www.anthropic.com/news/updating-restrictions-of-sales-to-unsupported-regions

Trae 会被断供吗

强国说我自己开发 agent 难度还比不上你

这家伙当年在百度是受了多少委屈啊

路走窄了。霉国政府和他们的簇拥继续这么闭关锁国下去，迟早把自己玩死

authoritarian regions

太害怕了，一想到中国程序员没法 Vibe coding ，就感觉未来一片灰暗。我是不是应该为了用 Claude 润？

打起来！

Claude 家的政治倾向这么强烈的吗，背后掌舵大佬是哪个

牛的，要是全面封锁中文就屌了

＃3
这是啥情况？展开说说？

路走窄了，ChatGPT 和 Gemini 都没么激进，最多提示当前地区不可用。A 社直接封号

擦这么恐怖的嘛 别搞啊 已经依赖上 claude 了

以前百度的，估计被百度整蛊了

大多人都是用转发的把, cursor, kiro, augment 等等, 应该不影响

Anthropic 的联合创始人兼 CEO 是 Dario Amodei 。他这人思路挺鲜明的，主张 AI 要以所谓“民主价值”为指导，美国要带着盟友组个圈子，在 AI 的军事应用上保持优势，同时还推出口管制，尽量卡住对手拿到先进技术。

查到的是说创始人 2014 年 11 月 – 2015 年 10 月在百度硅谷 AI 实验室担任 Research Scientist
感觉犯不上吧

格局小了啊

昨天收到一封邮件说，它将会用 Chat 用于训练，并且数据保留 5 年。
其实，它只要把涉及中文的直接 ban 掉，就能省掉一半事情了。你用中文问，它直接拒绝服务，并且永久封禁即可。

其实 claude 真不想中国人用, 强制模型只输出英语就行了

互联网时代的冷战？一边 deepseek 在开源，一边 Claude 要暂停敌对国家普通人民的使用权。这是不是剥夺了"敌对国家"人民的自由权，出生在"敌对国家"是它们的错吗？

新加坡这些海外地区怎么说

但是 claude 是真的牛逼。所以我还是选择偷偷使用。

我国的网络封锁技术十分强大，想必反封锁的技术也不会太差。

＃21 +1 繁体中文也会嘛？杀这么狠

问了几个大模型。都说更精准的翻译是 对手国家 而非 敌对国家。

百度是出了名的 AI 黄埔军校 培养了一堆 ai 人才

刚好抵制，双向奔赴了。

本身就是冷战状态,不是什么互联网冷战.

＃25
别洗了别洗了

新加坡中文是官方书面语言吗？大马人讲中文比新加坡本地人还好。新加坡人英文比中文好多了。

反向建墙？

good job

那些说直接封中文的，应该是理解上有误区，华人现在遍布全世界，封中文相当于种族歧视，在美国可是大忌。

有本事就封 放心总会找到出路的

华人遍布世界，说明华人未必全讲汉语，未必用中文。老黄是华人吗？他讲的普通语标准吗？他用英文不比用中文好多了？还“误区”。

没上市就是硬气，看老黄为了股价千方百计卖到中国

路走窄了

那咋了？

反复点名，哈哈。

双标而已 ，一边寻求来自阿联酋和卡塔尔的投资， 一边要阿联酋和卡塔尔这种世袭的资金，一边指责中国！不过敌对倒是说了实话！一不小心超过了怎么办呢？

＃36
其实 NV 都知道 现在受管制的也一直有正式渠道卖到中国 都是从新加坡的特定公司直接送中国 这公司后面还有 NV 的人的背影

然后到中国内地 如果是卖给一类受限的单位,根本演都不演,就是直接招标投, 中标的都是小科技公司啥也不怕
如果是二类单位 比如运营商 基本就是以二手名义和整机名义 实际全新

「敌对国家」

「专制地区」

「影响我们的民主目标」

何意味？你好好说话就好好说话，上什么政治价值、意识形态？背后必有高人指点

很早了，用 Claude 只能开新加坡、东京节点，开香港都不行

Good job ！

看完了，确实是明显政治倾向不希望让中国地区使用了。但是真想利用你的技术也不需要用这些小技俩来访问你，普通用户就完全是花钱买服务而已。

卧槽，这小子这么反华

对手不就是敌对方吗？
拿到你拿对手当友方？

建议尽快

我也在用它...

我就用，你有本事过来打我啊

这么恨吗？